nice
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Wait... It was actually white and gold the whole time? I never saw it as white and gold

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No?

    The dress was confirmed as a royal blue "Lace Bodycon Dress" from the retailer Roman Originals. The dress is black and blue; although it was available in three other colours (red, pink, and ivory, each with black lace), a white and gold version was not available at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    the photo yes but not the dress itself, take the og photo from the wiki into any photoshop with a color picker, and look at the points it marks it on the color range (it shows it between yellow and red nowhere near any blue) its gold stripes in the photo. the "white dress" parts do show up with light blue tint, it all just because of the terrible back light overexposed effect. the real dress yes is blue and black, but the photo is gold stripes with light-blueish white dress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I wouldn't call this "nowhere near blue":

    4QllEeY8KqBBfGI.png

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    the 'black' parts are gold in the photo yes they are in fact "nowhere near blue" the part you zoomed in on is the blue/white parts that have a blue tint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago*

    ...

    Did you pick that colour from the part that's black IRL? Of course that won't be blue.

    Edit: Here's the original picture with max saturation. It clearly shows the blue parts as blue:

  • source
  • parent