▲ 484 ▼ RIP Discord: Self-Hosted Discord Alternatives Tested (TeamSpeak, Stoat, Fluxer, Matrix, & More) (i.ytimg.com) submitted 7 months ago by recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 149 comments fedilink hide all child comments Invidious Youtube
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (4 children) out of the loop. what is discord doing to force an exodus? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 13 points 7 months ago* (2 children) ID check. This was also a few months after they had a major leak and hackers stole personal information. They downplayed it but if it's like all the other social media platforms, it's going to be garbage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) I thought they cancelled.l the ID thing after the backlash. They are still rolling it out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] keckbug@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago They have publicly rolled back this particular effort. It’s extraordinarily likely that this will resurface in a few months with a different coat of paint. Not to defend discord, they’re plenty shitty, but the core ID verification premise may be out of their hands, based on the surge in legislation on the topic globally. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skavau@piefed.social 7 points 7 months ago Bringing in age-ID verification that they had to apply in the UK and Australia globally for all accounts to access NSFW channels and to be able to take the baby filter off of DMs. They got heavy backlash for it, and have now delayed it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 13 points 7 months ago* (2 children) ID check. This was also a few months after they had a major leak and hackers stole personal information. They downplayed it but if it's like all the other social media platforms, it's going to be garbage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) I thought they cancelled.l the ID thing after the backlash. They are still rolling it out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] keckbug@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago They have publicly rolled back this particular effort. It’s extraordinarily likely that this will resurface in a few months with a different coat of paint. Not to defend discord, they’re plenty shitty, but the core ID verification premise may be out of their hands, based on the surge in legislation on the topic globally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) I thought they cancelled.l the ID thing after the backlash. They are still rolling it out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] keckbug@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago They have publicly rolled back this particular effort. It’s extraordinarily likely that this will resurface in a few months with a different coat of paint. Not to defend discord, they’re plenty shitty, but the core ID verification premise may be out of their hands, based on the surge in legislation on the topic globally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] keckbug@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago They have publicly rolled back this particular effort. It’s extraordinarily likely that this will resurface in a few months with a different coat of paint. Not to defend discord, they’re plenty shitty, but the core ID verification premise may be out of their hands, based on the surge in legislation on the topic globally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 7 points 7 months ago Bringing in age-ID verification that they had to apply in the UK and Australia globally for all accounts to access NSFW channels and to be able to take the baby filter off of DMs. They got heavy backlash for it, and have now delayed it. permalink fedilink source parent