160
First as farce, then as tragedy (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/noncredibledefense@piefed.social
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I literally posted the same suggestion in this community three days ago as a joke!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Problem is, in order to build a proper canal, you'll need more and/or bigger explosions. Supposedly there are still a couple W53 warheads stashed away, they wouldn't exactly make short work of it, but significantly shorter work than that all that weak newfangled stuff.

For a rough estimate, how many and how powerful explosions you might need, check out this brilliant idea from the 1950s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Double post, but uh, also kind of worth noting that roughly the border between UAE and Oman...

    ... is a mountain range.

    So you'd have to go through the passes, which of course already have highways and towns.

    ... and basically everything south of Abu Dhabi is a nature preserve.

    Also, not sure how out of date this is, but:

    Presumably, you would not want to nuke an already existing oil pipeline.

    ... which my NukeMap 'path'... does, basically.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    … is a mountain range.

    More nukes are surely going to solve that problem.

    Presumably, you would not want to nuke an already existing oil pipeline.

    Why not? Just fill the canal with oil instead of water and make it the new pipeline. This will also save money by not requiring ships to transport the oil. Or you can drive a ship filled with oil on the canal filled with oil, giving you twice the oil in one go. (certainly no insane troll logic here)

    Real life ideas involving nukes to make canals through the desert aren't that much less insane, and also give a rough estimate of the amount and size of nukes required.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Yep, that's entirely correct.

    I was trying to do a more low end, 'what would the damages be to the human environment,.at minimum' kind of thing.

    And as best I can tell, yeah, it gets worse with bigger nukes, because more stuff gets vaporized and turns into fallout.

    So you end up with radioactive sandstorms for... a decade or two?

    Its insane, its like, intentionally trying to turn that penninsula into the fucking zone from Stalker.... maybe Fallout Dust, the New Vegas mod?

    Sorry for the video game analogies but I ... I have no other frame of reference.

    I cannot overstate how insanely bad of an idea this is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent