you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Ryanair screwed those people.

Suggesting otherwise is siding with the abuser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The logic you're applying here would have all accounts frozen at a bank when a single customer disputes a charge, all parcels held when a carrier misdelivers a single item, grocery stores unable to sell food when one customer should have been refunded.

    No one is siding with Ryanair here. But laws can be enforced and justice can be carried out, without disrupting the lives of everyone else. There were likely on the order 200 people on that flight who would have been caught in the crossfire of a dispute they have no part in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Sherifs have seized bank office property to enforce judgements. It’s extremely effective at getting business to pay court judgements they have dodged for years.

    If we do this more often companies would take court judgements seriously. Only takes one disrupted flight to fix an unjust legal system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Seizing "office property" isn't going to disrupt customers in the same way as seizing a plane, and again, no one is saying don't seize a plane, or don't punish Ryanair - just don't seize a plane with passengers already on it (at least without going through a process that includes a threat and a deadline, so the customers can, theoretically, be spared).

  • source
  • parent