▲ 625 ▼ Easy-to-use solar panels are coming, but utilities are trying to delay them (www.npr.org) submitted 8 months ago by fuzzyfirefox@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 245 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) E: downboats for facts, I guess Downvote because you can be right and also be an asshole. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 8 months ago (3 children) What part of that did you interpret as me being an asshole? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children) A large portion of the comments in this thread are you arguing with various people. It's needlessly combative and condescending. You're treating conversations as if they were conflicts instead of recognizing that you and the other party are simply misunderstanding each other. You appear to know what you're talking about, but you are a little too reddit-pilled in your argument style. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 child) If you read those comments you'll find that they were rude and condescending to me first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation. You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot. If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 8 months ago (3 children) What part of that did you interpret as me being an asshole? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children) A large portion of the comments in this thread are you arguing with various people. It's needlessly combative and condescending. You're treating conversations as if they were conflicts instead of recognizing that you and the other party are simply misunderstanding each other. You appear to know what you're talking about, but you are a little too reddit-pilled in your argument style. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 child) If you read those comments you'll find that they were rude and condescending to me first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation. You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot. If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children) A large portion of the comments in this thread are you arguing with various people. It's needlessly combative and condescending. You're treating conversations as if they were conflicts instead of recognizing that you and the other party are simply misunderstanding each other. You appear to know what you're talking about, but you are a little too reddit-pilled in your argument style. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 child) If you read those comments you'll find that they were rude and condescending to me first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation. You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot. If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 child) If you read those comments you'll find that they were rude and condescending to me first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation. You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot. If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation. You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot. If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions. permalink fedilink source parent