206
Lutris is AI slop now (i.ibb.co.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/opensource@programming.dev
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Do you create, or just consume?

A world without copyright would be significantly worse for the people who makes things, like writers, artists, musicians, etc.

In the real world, with the current laws, nobody should be entitled to exploit other people's physical or intellectual labor. If profit is exploitation, then why wouldn't AI be?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    So you support FOSS? So does that mean you believe source code should be GPL or some other similar license?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I do support FOSS, in fact I have written FOSS code as part of my job in the non-profit space for almost a decade. I'm thankful for all of the people who write code whether it's copyleft GPL or permissive MIT. But I still recognize that it's their code and that they are simply granting me a license to use it under certain conditions.

    Generative AI takes those conditions and wipe their ass with them. I have a problem with that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •