you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

Your link doesn’t mention anything about “balcony solar”.

"Application process for rooftop solar and other smaller systems". If you want to export power to the grid from anything at all, you must go through this process. If you wanted to export power from a hamster on a wheel you must apply for PTO.

Because the whole point is to make solar easier and more affordable?

of course, but not at the cost of safety and grid reliability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

    Again, "other small systems" does not mean "balcony solar". It could just mean ground-mount systems. Everything I've found says it's not required. I challenge you to find the opposite.

    Effective March 2025, systems under 1.2kW are generally exempt from traditional building permits and utility interconnection agreements with providers like Rocky Mountain Power .

    Balcony solar is pretty much “plug and play.” Depending on the state/municipality/utility rules, users can install it themselves and don’t have to jump through all the permitting and contractual hoops or pay electricians in order to get it up and running like homeowners who install rooftop solar do

    https://cechouston.org/2025/10/21/balcony-solar-something-new-under-the-sun/

    E: downboats for facts, I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    downvotes because your facts are misinterpreted. This entire discussion is about exporting to the grid. All this legislation does is allow you to use balcony solar for yourself; NOT connecting it to the grid. If you want to export to the grid (like to participate in net metering) you still need PTO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    E: downboats for facts, I guess

    Downvote because you can be right and also be an asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    What part of that did you interpret as me being an asshole?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    A large portion of the comments in this thread are you arguing with various people. It's needlessly combative and condescending.

    You're treating conversations as if they were conflicts instead of recognizing that you and the other party are simply misunderstanding each other.

    You appear to know what you're talking about, but you are a little too reddit-pilled in your argument style.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If you read those comments you'll find that they were rude and condescending to me first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Being rude and condescending back didn't improve the situation.

    You were correct, factually, and they were wrong. People don't like being told that they're wrong and being rude is one of the more common reactions. If you're going to try to engage with people on topics where there is a lot of ignorance and misinformation you'll encounter that a lot.

    If you're just going to hit back then you're going to be spending a lot of time pissed off and wasting your time trash talking people who don't care what you have to say. To me, that tactic generates a lot of headache and no gain. Once it gets toxic I'd rather disengage or write as if I'm addressing the other members of the community who are reading along. Lemmy is still small enough where you can recognize people and develop a reputation so taking the high ground vs toxic people can pay dividends in terms of having other people listen to your opinions.

  • source
  • parent