Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

intellectual property is part of the capitalist culture FYI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    As is FOSS licensed software... Copyright and license notices at the top of every source file.

    So, why should anyone respect the GPL or even the MIT license when they can simply ignore it and exploit the work of the open source community?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t think they should? IP stifles innovation and artistic expression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Well, then I guess you're not such a fan of "open source" as the developer of Lutris is, because he has chosen to maintain the copyright of his work and license his code under the GPLv3.

    As a believer in FOSS myself, I think it's hypocritical that he expects people to respect the license attached to his code when he is choosing not to respect the licenses of others.

  • source
  • parent