Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Here's the thing. The more you use AI to generate your code, the less likely you are to fully review all of it, understand what it's doing and be able to fix it when bugs or exploits appear, or even know that they exist. So sure, it might work for now but what about in a couple of years of vibe coding it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Except, of course, that this not an imagined or even unlikely outcome; so, no, by definition your link fits not apply.

    Maybe read what you link???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    'It works fine now, but what about after years of this very recent development?' is absolutely imagined.

    You wanna argue for it? Argue. Don't posture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    It doesn't work fine now, though; that's the whole point. Vibe coding has resulted in numerous public failures, many of them costly. All avoidable.

    The tech debt involved is not some imaginary thing. A bullshit generator on steroids giving you magic coding power is, however, completely imaginary.

    And telling someone else "don't posture"?!? Then explain YOUR argument! Are you for real?!?

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)