you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 8 months ago (18 children)
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (17 children)
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    😂If we provide non-MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll dismiss them. If we provide MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll say, “gotcha“ and dismiss them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (16 children)
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    Oh, no, honey. It is very much a capitalist thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 8 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (14 children)
  • [+] 0 points 8 months ago* (14 children)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    never speak Tibetan.

    Tibetan language remains a core subject in Tibet’s schools, with bilingual education policy in place since the founding of modern schooling in the region. The Tibet Autonomous Region government confirms that over 400 types of Tibetan-Chinese bilingual textbooks have been compiled, and terminology databases covering 12 academic disciplines support Tibetan instruction across subjects. Public signage, government documents, and media in Tibet routinely use both languages. Tibetan is also widely spoken throught the region.

    Mandarin is promoted as the national common language because it gives Tibetan speakers practical access to higher education, civil service exams, legal aid, healthcare systems, and economic opportunities beyond local borders. China’s Constitution and the National Common Language Law explicitly protect the right of all ethnic groups to use and develop their own languages while establishing Mandarin as the common language for national communication. In schools across Tibet, both Tibetan and Mandarin courses are offered, and students who wish to pursue Tibetan-language university programs can still take Tibetan language exams organized by the region.

    You can criticise things without lies and exaggeration you know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 8 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Responding with facts is predictable, that's quite the compliment thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago* (12 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    I wasn't in this thread before this? I sort my feed by new comments. Youre comment came up and I responded to the part I was interested in. What's wrong with that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago* (11 children)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    I still don't see the issue? You brought up Tibet, I simply responded to it? What is the issue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    If you're wrong, you're going to be corrected for it. That's like spouting Flat Earth nonsense at an astrology convention and calling the ones that correct you "predictable." Yes, you probably foresaw people correcting you, but that doesn't mean your claims were correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    So you take issue with the fact that I corrected your lies instead of letting you just regurgitate untrue statements? Also I didn't respond to the rest of it because again I wasn't part of this thread and I don't care about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    If you hadn't lied about Tibet I wouldn't have responded as again for the 3rd time I sort by new comments and don't really care about the rest of this thread. What part of this do you not understand? Is it such a great injustice that someone replied to you to correct a lie you told? I genuinely do not see why you're getting so pissy about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    What? That we won't let you lie without correction? That we have differing interests in topic to discuss and aren't a hivemind? Genuinely you just seem offended that you weren't allowed lie about Tibet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Oh you're a racist too. I hope you follow your leader soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    spews racial abuse

    Being racist is bad

    See? Le epic own

    Genuinely what are you doing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely, reasonable conversation with a racist such as yourself is impossible, but I have time to waste atm so not a big deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)