Selfhosted

63,827 readers

4,550 active

426 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

TrueNAS build system going closed source (piefed.social)

submitted 8 months ago by Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Readme updated today:

This repository is no longer actively maintained.  

The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure. This transition was necessary to meet new security requirements, including support for Secure Boot and related platform integrity features that require tighter control over the build and signing pipeline.  

No further updates, pull requests, or issues will be accepted. Existing content is preserved here for historical reference only.

https://github.com/truenas/scale-build

Wondering if this is just the first step towards doing a minio in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It can be a bit of both.

I don't think secureboot is an attack on freedom exactly (and it's certainly not an instance of EEE), but I definitely think it shouldn't be Microsoft holding the keys.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Literally today Chris Titus released a video where he emphasized that no one should be using secure boot because the default backend is Microsoft and no one changes their secure boot config.

If that's true there's an argument that the name "secure boot" is hardly detachable from the defaults and thus that name is kid of burnt and shouldn't be recommended out of an abundance of caution for new users.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Saerana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Do you know the name of this video? I keep trying to search for a secure boot video by Chris Titus released today/yesterday but I'm not finding anything.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments