According to the release:

Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

The code was written by Cursor and Claude

14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not. That's the problem. It actually sucks ass. It's super low quality for anything more complex they s very simple CRUD app or a simple function. I say this as someone who s a heavy LLM user. It's just bad code. It makes all kinds of simple mistakes. Just because code compiles doesn't mean it's good or does what you need it to do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I think it largely depends on what you're building. You're not gonna get build a company overnight with a few prompts but it's much more powerful than you've described.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's really not though. If you think it is I really suggest to re-think your perspective on what maintainable shippable code looks like. It's basically automating copying from stack overflow. There's so many little considerations that come into development.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago

    Still sounds like something someone would say who has had a bad time and experience with generating code lol. It really isn't that hard to be an engineer and to get what you want out of code generation.

  • source
  • parent