you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's not the cost, it's the inconvenience.

Even if he has a spare tire for that monster, I wanna see him try replacing it, it'll be hilarious.

Or he'll have to call a tow and wait for it.

Either way, awesome. Push comes to shove, "your honor, I offer to settle this dispute by paying the cost of the valve I supposedly damaged."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    That's an interesting perspective.

    But usually the spare or donut comes with it's own rim and valve.... So shouldn't need a tow.

    But that's also why you always slash more than one tire. Nobody is carrying multiple donuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    A while back there was a local kerfuffle because some vandal was slashing the tires of cars which came to visit a local park at the top of a bluff. The vandal would only slash 3/4 tires and it apparently made getting insurance to cover it hell because insurance would cover 4 damaged tires but not only 3. Also 3 tires is more likely to be less than/about the insurance deductible thereby making it more costly to the owner. So the vandal was really causing maximum possible chaos by slashing only 3 tires

  • source
  • parent