240
800 gamers tried to beat an '80s adventure without a walkthrough—only 2 did - Only .25% of players completed the AGAT, the Adventure Game Aptitude Test, designed by fiendish developer Woe Industries. (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Factorio spends a lot of time optimizing the first 30 minutes of game play for this exact reason. Check out these blogs on it:

https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-241 https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-327

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    True, maybe a bad example. Although there are a few conventionts it might not bother to explain, like WASD for directional input, or scroll wheels, or whatever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think Factorio perfectly proves your point.

    The Devs spent a lot of time making sure you understand the game in the first 30 minutes. 80’s Devs didn’t do that and it shows in how hard the learning curve of the game is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    It goes even farther than that: games in the 80s didn't even necessarily have consistent designs that could be trained in the first 30 minutes. Especially the adventure games. They were also perfectly willing to let you lose the game in act 1 but not tell you about it until act 3, where the way they do "tell you" is you don't have any possible solution for a problem.

    Like if you don't get that delicious pie plus another food source early on, you'll either die of starvation or the yeti will eat you later in the game.

    But if you know what to do, the game becomes trivial.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent