▲ 425 ▼ Iranian state media confirms death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (www.nbcnews.com) submitted 8 months ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 105 comments fedilink hide all child comments Feel free to use this a megathread for the US/Israeli war on Iran.
[+] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 168 points 8 months ago (48 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 48 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 164 points 8 months ago (40 children) First two months of 2026: The US kidnaps one country's leader, murders another, and kills hundreds of civilians in two failed regime change attempts. Death to the burger empire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 59 points 8 months ago (38 children) The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. I'm still not over Maduro's kidnapping and how they pulled it off. It's freakish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 31 points 8 months ago (1 child) These sorts of attacks is what the US military has been investing in capacity to complete for decades. This is why there has been an investment bleeding edge tech which costs insane amounts of money to develop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It's low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 13 points 8 months ago The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago (32 children) Although, it's worth noting that this was largely a stunt. The US did not have the ability to actually invade Venezuela or to topple the government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 32 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago (31 children) It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it's just not convenient for them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago the military fully backed him thats why, not like donald planed it out, they did under his general order. that and kidnaping moduro hasn't really changed the country much after hes gone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago The real battle happens before any shots are fired. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Death to the burger empire. You'd be surprised how long dead ideas live permalink fedilink source parent [–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 18 points 8 months ago (1 child) Can they really be a “threat” when they’re actively killing people all over the world? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 8 months ago Yeah, more accurately they are the active enemies of world peace. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ripcord@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml -8 points 8 months ago (4 children) No. Most of what Russia does on the world stage is good, it is one of the biggest supporters of many global south countries and one of the few remaining bulwarks preventing US imperialism from running completely roughshod over the global south. For example right now, see Cuba and how Russia is providing support and oil as the US tries to starve them of energy and starve them to death. You may have been taught Putler=Voldemort, but no, Russia at this point is acting largely as a force for good in the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children) When they stop murdering children in Ukraine, which they can do literally any time they want, then I'll be more inclined to believe you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 8 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca -5 points 8 months ago LMFAO permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 164 points 8 months ago (40 children) First two months of 2026: The US kidnaps one country's leader, murders another, and kills hundreds of civilians in two failed regime change attempts. Death to the burger empire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 59 points 8 months ago (38 children) The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. I'm still not over Maduro's kidnapping and how they pulled it off. It's freakish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 31 points 8 months ago (1 child) These sorts of attacks is what the US military has been investing in capacity to complete for decades. This is why there has been an investment bleeding edge tech which costs insane amounts of money to develop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It's low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 13 points 8 months ago The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago (32 children) Although, it's worth noting that this was largely a stunt. The US did not have the ability to actually invade Venezuela or to topple the government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 32 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago (31 children) It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it's just not convenient for them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago the military fully backed him thats why, not like donald planed it out, they did under his general order. that and kidnaping moduro hasn't really changed the country much after hes gone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago The real battle happens before any shots are fired. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Death to the burger empire. You'd be surprised how long dead ideas live permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 59 points 8 months ago (38 children) The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. I'm still not over Maduro's kidnapping and how they pulled it off. It's freakish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 31 points 8 months ago (1 child) These sorts of attacks is what the US military has been investing in capacity to complete for decades. This is why there has been an investment bleeding edge tech which costs insane amounts of money to develop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It's low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 13 points 8 months ago The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago (32 children) Although, it's worth noting that this was largely a stunt. The US did not have the ability to actually invade Venezuela or to topple the government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 32 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago (31 children) It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it's just not convenient for them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago the military fully backed him thats why, not like donald planed it out, they did under his general order. that and kidnaping moduro hasn't really changed the country much after hes gone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago The real battle happens before any shots are fired. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 31 points 8 months ago (1 child) These sorts of attacks is what the US military has been investing in capacity to complete for decades. This is why there has been an investment bleeding edge tech which costs insane amounts of money to develop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It's low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It's low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 13 points 8 months ago The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago (32 children) Although, it's worth noting that this was largely a stunt. The US did not have the ability to actually invade Venezuela or to topple the government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 32 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago (31 children) It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it's just not convenient for them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago (31 children) It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it's just not convenient for them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (30 children) It's more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (29 children) I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (6 children) You'd argue and you'd lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you're clearly not seeing or you don't want to see how it's collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn't have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Attacking a different country every month isn't really a sign of strength. Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 8 months ago (3 children) Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength. They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline. To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) If this is not a sign of strength what else is? Not even needing to attack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago They didn't need to do that before, they could just sanction and ignore them. That stopped working. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (21 children) the US absolutely doesn't control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out. The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child) "The dying serpent always bites". The roman empire went out like this too, overextending itself with a lot of imperialist wars, then devolving into internal strife and instability until it hollowed out and everyone left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago Indeed, it does seem to be a consistent pattern throughout the ages. I imagine a big part of it is that the ruling class becomes increasingly disconnected from material reality, and they start making decisions based on how they think the world works rather than how it actually is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Your ability to regurgitate propaganda is impressive. Yet, it shows utter lack of capacity for critical thinking. Only an utter imbecile could think that a proxy war with NATO would last for days. And why would they go after Zelensky, what would that accomplish exactly? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (16 children) the US absolutely doesn’t control the world We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (15 children) You genuinely think that Russia or China does not have the capability to do that? The difference here isn't that the US is more capable, it's that it's a rabid dog. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (14 children) russia and china don't have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (13 children) Russia and China are nuclear superpowers, they can turn any country into glass. Meanwhile, the US isn't even able to produce weapons on its own with importing critical things like rare earths from China which the US isn't capable of producing in any significant quantity. If you think that deindustrialized shithole that's currently being outproduced by Russia militarily is a global hegemon, then I don't know what else to tell you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (12 children) North korea has nukes too, that doesn't mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn't automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn't spend in war as half of what US does. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Again, if you think the US attacking countries and killing their leaders is a show of strength then you're deluded. What makes China and Russia more powerful is that they have actual domestic industry, and can produce their own weapons. The US cannot do that. Meanwhile, spending a bunch of money on war just shows how inefficient the US military industrial complex is. Here's what the reality looks like https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/16/is-russia-producing-a-years-worth-of-nato-ammunition-in-three-months The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (9 children) What makes China and Russia more powerful You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles. So are most countries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) that's an amazing counterpoint there to the fact that Russia alone is outproducing all of NATO 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (7 children) How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (6 children) The Burger Reich isn't much better at producing missiles than it is at producing artillery shells. Perhaps you don't understand that artillery shells are much easier to produce than missiles, and if you can't even produce the former you have no hope of producing the latter in any quantity? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/25/iran-weapons-trump-troops-defense-00797801 You sound like an utter ignoramus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (5 children) If you argue that the burger reich doesn't have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn't running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) The US is absolutely running out of munitions. The reality is that the US lacks the industrial base to keep up with the rate of use. Industry accounts for mere 9.5% of the economy. Steel production in the US is barely higher than Russia, and the US is unable to produce stuff like rare earths on its own. People seem to buy into the mythology the US has created around itself, but numbers don't lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) "According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% " Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don't have enough to win ww3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Again, given the rate of use of these missiles, it's quite clear they can't keep this up for long. Each intercept takes at least two missiles, and production rate is nowhere close to the use rate. Thousands of missiles might sound like a lot, but that's really a few months supply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* Let's see what happens in a month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago That is literally because they don't have the missile range. I also assume they have far less warheads stockpiled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago the military fully backed him thats why, not like donald planed it out, they did under his general order. that and kidnaping moduro hasn't really changed the country much after hes gone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago The real battle happens before any shots are fired. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago Death to the burger empire. You'd be surprised how long dead ideas live permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 18 points 8 months ago (1 child) Can they really be a “threat” when they’re actively killing people all over the world? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 8 months ago Yeah, more accurately they are the active enemies of world peace. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 8 months ago Yeah, more accurately they are the active enemies of world peace. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ripcord@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml -8 points 8 months ago (4 children) No. Most of what Russia does on the world stage is good, it is one of the biggest supporters of many global south countries and one of the few remaining bulwarks preventing US imperialism from running completely roughshod over the global south. For example right now, see Cuba and how Russia is providing support and oil as the US tries to starve them of energy and starve them to death. You may have been taught Putler=Voldemort, but no, Russia at this point is acting largely as a force for good in the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children) When they stop murdering children in Ukraine, which they can do literally any time they want, then I'll be more inclined to believe you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 8 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca -5 points 8 months ago LMFAO permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml -8 points 8 months ago (4 children) No. Most of what Russia does on the world stage is good, it is one of the biggest supporters of many global south countries and one of the few remaining bulwarks preventing US imperialism from running completely roughshod over the global south. For example right now, see Cuba and how Russia is providing support and oil as the US tries to starve them of energy and starve them to death. You may have been taught Putler=Voldemort, but no, Russia at this point is acting largely as a force for good in the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children) When they stop murdering children in Ukraine, which they can do literally any time they want, then I'll be more inclined to believe you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 8 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca -5 points 8 months ago LMFAO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children) When they stop murdering children in Ukraine, which they can do literally any time they want, then I'll be more inclined to believe you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 8 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 8 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We live in your head rent free huh. And no, our ideas aren't simply "x is bad", without violent resistance we'd have slavery, white women would be chained to the kitchen, workers would have never got a 40h work week, etc. We don't have a consensus on Russia and many will defend it harder because it's funny to piss off people like you, but Russia is nowhere near as bad as the US, and we wouldn't have modern Russia if it weren't for the US as well. Look at the numbers of people killed just by western sanctions alone, it's over half a million a year. The US has removed democratically elected leaders too many times, like Salvador Allende in Chile or even Mosaddegh. They're starving Cuba RIGHT NOW. But I guess unless mainstream media tells you our lives matter you just don't care. So yeah, slander us all you want, but we're nothing if not ideologically consistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago We can play this game forever, my point is that I don't believe you really care about our lives in the global south, considering you seem to ignore that the vast majority of conflicts involving Russia wouldn't have manifested without western imperialism. We lose people all the time through sanctions and regime changes and IMF imposed austerity. We don't celebrate Ukrainian civilians dying, the war that common Ukrainians no longer want to fight won't end as long as the west refuses a deal. permalink fedilink source parent