▲ 33 ▼ Alberta projects deficit of nearly C$9.4bn, citing low oil prices (www.bbc.com) submitted 8 months ago by NomNom@feddit.uk to c/alberta@lemmy.ca 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] BinzyBoi@piefed.ca 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago I don't know if Alberta is like Ontario, but here in Ontario over the last 3 decades the province has slowly been reducing how much it transfers to cities while also offloading more expenses onto those cities. This has resulted in: higher house prices as cities have needed to start adding large fees to house building in-order to help balance the books (and raising property taxes is always very unpopular) worse public transit as the provinces now expect cities to take on more of those expenses. And likely other things too. But those are the ones always on my mind permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 child) Yeah I was getting at the fact that they're underfunded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 8 months ago The report from the city actually found they were underspending on risk analysis and mitigation, not that they were underfunded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago I don't know if Alberta is like Ontario, but here in Ontario over the last 3 decades the province has slowly been reducing how much it transfers to cities while also offloading more expenses onto those cities. This has resulted in: higher house prices as cities have needed to start adding large fees to house building in-order to help balance the books (and raising property taxes is always very unpopular) worse public transit as the provinces now expect cities to take on more of those expenses. And likely other things too. But those are the ones always on my mind permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 child) Yeah I was getting at the fact that they're underfunded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 8 months ago The report from the city actually found they were underspending on risk analysis and mitigation, not that they were underfunded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 8 months ago The report from the city actually found they were underspending on risk analysis and mitigation, not that they were underfunded. permalink fedilink source parent