62
Nasa announces Artemis III mission no longer aims to send humans to moon (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/space@mander.xyz
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wow. This is huge, and puts doubt on ever walking on the moon again. The original plan was obviously nuts with its weird orbits and mad refueling profile, but it was a plan at least! II was due to send astronauts the furthest into space EVER about now also. What is III to accomplish? When could IV fly, and will lunar descent then occur?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago*

    puts doubt on ever walking on the moon again

    Well, for the American space program at least. Not for as long as the US continues to drastically underfund NASA since isn't as useful in weapons manufacturing nowadays.

    China is still underway to land astronauts on the moon by 2030 from what I can see, and I'd bet they aren't anywhere near as underfunded as NASA has been

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    What is III to accomplish?

    It will be a practice run in LEO, a la Apollo 9.

    When could IV fly, and will lunar descent then occur?

    It's currently NET 2028, which is the same year as the old Artemis 3. In terms of schedule, it's like they're inserting an "Artemis 2.5" mission, between Artemis 2 and the crewed lunar landing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent