▲ 1059 ▼ 71% of Americans say the US should spend more on "assistance to the poor". But if you use the word "welfare" that number drops to 30% (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments Words matter. Always use simple direct language. Help the poor Healthcare for everyone Good treatment at work. Don't use complex words.
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 149 points 1 year ago (10 children) One of many lasting “gifts” of Reagan. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 year ago (3 children) We’ve got to get all those welfare queens 25 year old males playing video games back to work! They’re getting a free ride that they don’t deserve. People only have value when they are working! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 28 points 1 year ago He started that evil welfare queen idea back in California. It gained traction there so he continued to use it on the national side. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) dont you love the misogyny in that "queens" label? because who makes a better scapegoat than black mothers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Currently? Mexicans and Middle easterners, it would seem. They’re all criminals and rapists apparently. /s permalink fedilink source parent [–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children) I'm glad Reagan's dead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I'm not. I much rather he lived forever. Forever wasting away, seeing his loved ones perish, losing his sanity little by ever so fucking little, inhabiting a hell all of his own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Regan loved ones permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included. It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent [–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wym? Just a few more decades, and the trickling down will surely start. I can already taste it on their boots permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 year ago (3 children) We’ve got to get all those welfare queens 25 year old males playing video games back to work! They’re getting a free ride that they don’t deserve. People only have value when they are working! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 28 points 1 year ago He started that evil welfare queen idea back in California. It gained traction there so he continued to use it on the national side. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) dont you love the misogyny in that "queens" label? because who makes a better scapegoat than black mothers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Currently? Mexicans and Middle easterners, it would seem. They’re all criminals and rapists apparently. /s permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 28 points 1 year ago He started that evil welfare queen idea back in California. It gained traction there so he continued to use it on the national side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) dont you love the misogyny in that "queens" label? because who makes a better scapegoat than black mothers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Currently? Mexicans and Middle easterners, it would seem. They’re all criminals and rapists apparently. /s permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Currently? Mexicans and Middle easterners, it would seem. They’re all criminals and rapists apparently. /s permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children) I'm glad Reagan's dead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I'm not. I much rather he lived forever. Forever wasting away, seeing his loved ones perish, losing his sanity little by ever so fucking little, inhabiting a hell all of his own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Regan loved ones permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included. It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I'm not. I much rather he lived forever. Forever wasting away, seeing his loved ones perish, losing his sanity little by ever so fucking little, inhabiting a hell all of his own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Regan loved ones permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included. It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Regan loved ones permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included. It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included. It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents. Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths. I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional. OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Wym? Just a few more decades, and the trickling down will surely start. I can already taste it on their boots permalink fedilink source parent