▲ 705 ▼ Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?" (opper.ai) submitted 8 months ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 334 comments fedilink hide all child comments Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there. Also includes outtakes on the 'reasoning' models.
[+] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (2 children) Instead it tries to make sense of it. Why? Because it learned strong language priors from us and it leans on that when the prompt is meaningless. It tries to make sense of it. No, it doesn't. You're in sci-fi land. There is no "it" "trying to make sense". That cogitation is happening in YOU, not the motherboard. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago Sure, there’s no ghost in the machine - but that’s true of your neurons too. Touché. Intelligence doesn't require "self" and we're a living proof of that. The way LLMs and humans operate have much more similarities than people like to admit. We're just applying higher standards to AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (2 children) Instead it tries to make sense of it. Why? Because it learned strong language priors from us and it leans on that when the prompt is meaningless. It tries to make sense of it. No, it doesn't. You're in sci-fi land. There is no "it" "trying to make sense". That cogitation is happening in YOU, not the motherboard. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago Sure, there’s no ghost in the machine - but that’s true of your neurons too. Touché. Intelligence doesn't require "self" and we're a living proof of that. The way LLMs and humans operate have much more similarities than people like to admit. We're just applying higher standards to AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago Sure, there’s no ghost in the machine - but that’s true of your neurons too. Touché. Intelligence doesn't require "self" and we're a living proof of that. The way LLMs and humans operate have much more similarities than people like to admit. We're just applying higher standards to AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago Sure, there’s no ghost in the machine - but that’s true of your neurons too. Touché. Intelligence doesn't require "self" and we're a living proof of that. The way LLMs and humans operate have much more similarities than people like to admit. We're just applying higher standards to AI. permalink fedilink source parent