126
Ladybird Browser adopts Rust, with help from AI (ladybird.org)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lobsters.

We’ve been searching for a memory-safe programming language to replace C++ in Ladybird for a while now. We previously explored Swift, but the C++ interop never quite got there, and platform support outside the Apple ecosystem was limited. Rust is a different story. The ecosystem is far more mature for systems programming, and many of our contributors already know the language. Going forward, we are rewriting parts of Ladybird in Rust.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Surely you read the article?

"The requirement from the start was byte-for-byte identical output from both pipelines. "

The bytecode from C++ is identical to the Rust output.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    I don't think it's possible to write rust code that compiles to the exact same binary as c++. compilers make different optimizations, and make overall a different structure, especially across languages.

    I think they meant the rust library produces the same output from the same input as the c++ library.

    if llms indeed generate worse rust code than for other languages, that's not that big of a problem because the compiler will catch a lot of mistakes. if it compiles, it will run, and no memory safety bugs unless unsafe is also used. the llm could pick the wrong functions for some uses, but that should be caught relatively easily with testing, which can be automated partly

    edit: I was wrong, they indeed say that. this is weird.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent