192
How can we protect kids from the harms of social media without sacrificing everyone's privacy? (piefed.ca)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
262 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Some of it can be accomplished by just setting universal demands for how social media works for all users:

  • ban targeted advertising
  • make it mandatory for companies to ensure algorithms don't prioritize posts for making users angry, scared or depressed

Stuff like that. These kinds of regulations don't involve ID checks, and could take care of a big chunk of the problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    This doesn't solve the problem at the core of social media. The inevitable comparison of fake lives on impressionable children/teens has been shown to cause depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideations. There is nothing that can be done algorithm or advertising wise that would stop that from happening.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    If you do the 1st one, then most companies likely wouldn't bother with such algorithms anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I dunno, they will still want people to stick around on their site, so they can see their ads.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    I figure a ban of targeted advertisement would look like "The ads are only allowed to change once a day, and everybody during said day sees the same ads". Whereas currently, each time you load a website, there's an impromptu auction to sell the ad spots. (Advertisers don't actually have to pay until you click their ad). So there would be less incentive to keep the user constantly engaged, as it would be enough if the user just visits regularly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    That's interesting, and maybe better than what I had in mind.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •