you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Didn't ring already prove they were permanently recording and storing the data from every ring camera even if the person that bought it doesn't pay for a subscription?

The conspiracy theorists joking/lamenting about how seemingly everyone decided that buying a listening device to put in every room was fine because it had a name, and not long after, the same company known for exploiting its warehouse workers, union busting and general privacy violations brought out the 'build your own panopticon' kit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    They may have done, but if you're referring to the kidnapped woman who's footage was pulled from the backend after they said she didn't have a subscription, she had a Google Nest Camera.

    I wouldn't doubt that Amazon does this too but Google is just as bad if not worse.

  • source
  • parent