Agreed, that's the way the rule was written. A few YouTube people commented months ago about the possibility to use that loophole.
The 2026 regulations have loads of such loopholes. E.g. that cars are hard to follow are partly due to yet another loophole.
In a Dutch interview he said it's way slower. You're really twisting his words.
Didn't ring already prove
That was Google Nest. Though those cameras always gave you 3 hours to watch back footage, even without a subscription.
They say it'll have high quality public transport. If this is the same area that a city planner once talked about then it'll be quite troublesome. Using models they can predict how effective the mobility will be. For the neighborhood he talked about the plans would not work at all.
If I investigate this plan it seems it'll just be bus lines. At the moment just 2 stops. For 6.000 houses. That seems like a failure.
With the housing shortage they might get sold anyway.
Right to move? How is that arranged or made legal?
It's not a weird vendetta. He's been given some money to be against solar and wind.
You're talking about companies with offices in the US. I'm talking about foreign countries. E.g. Postnl (company without offices in the US).
How would a foreign country collect this in behalf of the US? No system has been setup for this by the US.
EU, UK and others have systems in place to make this possible. The US hasn't.
In the EU similar stuff is promoted by companies wanting to profit from supplying the various required software.