PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,922 readers

6,019 active

1,305 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

After 3,000 hours and two years another OLED gaming monitor burn-in assessment finds only minor panel damage (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by cm0002@literature.cafe to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Burn-in is the one big worry with OLED monitors. But evidence that it shouldn't be a dealer breaker for gamers is approaching critical mass thanks to another long-term assessment released today.

YouTube channel Optimum has been using a 32-inch 4K LG WOLED monitor for around 3,000 hours over two years and has found only minor burn-in. This is a particularly handy metric given that one of the best known existing trackers of OLED burn-in by Monitors Unboxed has been based on a monitor with a Samsung QD-OLED panel. Now we have something similar for LG WOLED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

"Only minor".

Also I did the math, it's 125 days of runtime.

Its inappropriate for any display to damage itself within one year of doing its only job.

permalink

fedilink

source