you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (25 children)

    Sovereignty is a huge issue here - handing control of critical infrastructure to a US oligarch is just begging to be coerced and exploited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Unironically, yes. I don't know if you're trying to make that scenario sound ridiculous, but I can assure you that it very much is not. At least outside of the US.

    It's not everyone at the moment, but the IT people who are paying attention are freaking the fuck out. I legitimately think Microsoft, AWS, and GCP will lose substantial market share overseas in the next 24 months.

    Consider that much of the rest of the world has started trusting China more than the US. Now think about the US CLOUD Act. What person in their right mind is going to feel comfortable hosting their company's most sensitive data within jurisdictional reach of whatever the fuck is going on over there?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Same applies to all social networks and MS Windows, right?

    The only social networks I willingly use are Fediverse instances, none I'm registered on are hosted in the US.

    No device in my house runs Windows. Linux is an upgrade, I recommend it.

    Things that rich people own manufacturing of?

    As a socialist, I believe the working class must seize the means of production, and am doing my part in building that future for us all.

    What about cars? They’re pretty much govt spyware now too.

    Yes, I despise the 'smart' features shoved into cars, televisions, etc.. I am also active in /c/fuckcars, I am critical of their overuse and rarely use one.


    Now, none of this is necessary for us to recognize that giving the US control of important infrastructure is dangerous. But you did ask. And many governments are also moving away from US infrastructure, although more slowly.


    As for Starlink, its common use is the result of laziness and neglect. Satellite internet is clearly not the cheapest, fastest or most efficient for most of its customers to get modern internet infrastructure. Governments should be reducing their citizens' need for Starlink as a serious priority, by building internet infrastructure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Yep people here hate windows. We hate cars, for reasons aside from spying as well they just generally suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    People still drive but only because we have no choice most of the time. In a lot of places particularly the US and Australia it's impossible to participate in society without owning a car or people thinking there is something wrong with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    I did it for years in the city but can’t anymore.

    So yeah, anyhow, that’s my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    What's your point? People have to do things they hate? Why not develop that thought further? WHY do we have to, and is a world where we have to less often (or not at all) possible?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, in search of answers. Not to defend a point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Why do you use the phrase "that's my point" if you're not trying to make one. You seem confused

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Starlink has been proven to be utilized for dubious activity to undermine sovereignty (see Mossad coup attemptin Iran as a most recent example). It hides under the guise of global internet for those who otherwise wouldn't have access but seeing as how it comes at the cost of western imperial overreach, having solid counter measures ain't a bad idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Think about iran, where they had to jam the starlink signal to keep the cia agents from murdering everyone (they paid per murder).

    Now if usa attacked a less powerful country without jamming technology, the cia agents could get their orders and data over starlink, and use that to murder everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (22 children)

    That it's owned by ... the person who owns it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago

    I also have a problem with overengineered inferior solutions to investing in improving and expanding what is cheap and works very well and that will negatively impact future space projects.

    You know, his entire shtick.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Him being a nazi pedophile is probably what most people take issue with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    What party line? It's the truth? He's in the Epstein files begging to go "party" on the island. He hit multiple nazi salutes on camera. It's not a line it's a statement of fact Elon Musk is a nazi pedophile.

    Bad faith is when people point out my idol is fucking evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I was hoping you were genuinely concerned about the most effective and equitable solution to get such an important utility to as many people as possible but clearly you're just here to defend the weird billionaire

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    I don't think you can call something that can be shut down by a single company "global internet"

    I have problems with the satellites sure, but fundamentally the whole premise is flawed.

    Also spacex isn't exactly doing great ok engineering compared to ULA and other industry leaders. Feels a bit weird to put them on a pedestal.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    He's a white supremacist who grew up in apartheid South Africa, comes from a family of racists (look up his grandfather, Elon is doing everything he can to carry on his legacy), and regularly promotes racist conspiracy theories. If you genuinely haven't seen any signs that he's a Nazi then you haven't been fucking paying attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Please just go back to Reddit. You're just here to try to wreck this community, and we all know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I’m sorry you feel this way. I haven’t been on reddit in years. I’ll limit or block Lemmy.ml, tension high af in here. Clearly I wandered into an echo chamber I don’t belong in!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    It's not that you don't belong, it's that you engage in rhetorical strategies that are emotionally abusive while writing apologia for nazis.

    It's just the paradox of tolerance. If we tolerate Nazi apologia, that's all the site will become (just like Twitter). If I were a mod, your comments defending musk's Nazi salute would be deleted and you would be permanently banned, but I'm not a mod. So, I'm asking nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I already see this is going to be a fruitless discussion with those proposed discussion points. "His attempt to reduce government spending" 🤣 "attempt".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (2 children)

    He didn't do anything to reduce government spending other than dismantling agencies investigating him for malfeasance. That was a lazy cover to steal government data while simultaneously destroying any accountability for his crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    his Asperger’s

    As an autistic person, don't you FUCKING DARE defend his use of that fucking card for the horrible way he acts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    What didn't make sense about his point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    (Edit: made a more formal comment closer to the root of the thread)

    Why? Launching shit into space is hard as fuck and has an enormous carbon footprint. You can build A LOT of cellular infrastructure for the same cost and impact.

    And building your internet infrastructure in your own territory instead of floating in space will make it a lot harder for China to shoot with their badass microwave canon.

    And I'm just a common idiot, but I'd wager upgrading satellite infrastructure is going to be slightly more expensive than terrestrial infrastructure. There's a reason we're still using a lot of satellite infrastructure from the 1980s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago

    Starlink satellites are disposable from the start. They have a five year lifespan before deorbiting and burning up. So launches continue forever. So basically upgrades just come as they come, the mechanism is already in place. No clue on how costs compare with upgrading hundreds of thousands of terrestrial towers every 10 years or whatever is needed.

    Agreed that domestic benefits would require far more analysis than I’m capable of.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)