you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 62 points 9 months ago (19 children)

Steam data is hardly skewed towards a data center with a lot of RAM, and supports the idea of 16 GB being the default for most users, with a newly increased trend towards 32 GB (that is very likely going to be shattered and revert to 16 GB in 2026 given the current scenario).

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I heard some people are starting to go for older CPU and older gen RAM out of desperation.

    So the amount of RAM is half of the story. Many will not be able to build setups with the current gen of RAM.

    I know I will be stuck to DDR4 for a while...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There are literally more amazing games than time to play them if you look the manufactured hype of modern games.

    I can't see a reason to upgrade my 9 year old 7600k with 16gb ram. I still play everything I'm interested in playing.

    Appreciate I won't play AAAs, which I am opposed to anyway with their anti consumer practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (15 children)

    Why would the average drop? People already have the RAM so wouldn't we just see it stagnate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    As old computers age out of gaming-worthiness and/or just die, new computers are built to replace them, and the high cost of memory may force some to get less RAM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    But wouldn't people just stick with their current PC instead of downgrade?

    Especially because they very likely can get a better CPU with the same socket, and a better graphics card.

    I find it hard to imagine a scenario where you would go to less RAM instead of keeping what you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    What if your GPU or RAM dies?

    I mean as long as your PC is still viable, sure. But at some point even a partial downgrade can be an upgrade in some ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    More people buying new computers, new computers have 16 GBs of RAM, average drops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I just find it hard to imagine people will buy a worse computer instead of keeping the one they have, but I'll happily admit it if I turn out to be wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    RAM is only 1/3 of the most critical components.

    If you have DDR4 on want to upgrade your CPU, you'll end up with a DDR5 MoBo, your old RAM will be useless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    Not necessarily, most people will be able to upgrade their CPU to a better model with the same socket. Sockets aren't updated every time a CPU is released, and most people won't be buying the top of the top even if they were, meaning there's room to grow as prices drop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    If you have DDR4 RAM, no modern* CPU will fit your MoBo.

    * as in: from the last couple of years

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Well the last couple of years is pretty restrictive. If you're upgrading every few years you'll probably just bite the bullet and pay for the RAM.

    My last comment was basically saying you can upgrade to the top of the line CPU that fits your mobo, giving you an upgrade for not too much cash. Better than forking out for DDR5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    A two year old CPU with 16 GB of DDR5 RAM will be around two to four times faster than a five year old CPU with 32 GB of DDR4 RAM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Maybe but hardly anyone had 32GB of RAM 5 years ago so that's unlikely to feed into the average. My original thought was that I don't think the average will go down, because people will keep their current hardware for longer. Maybe we will see mobos with modern sockets and DDR4 support if this drags on, but hopefully the bubble will burst by Christmas and we'll all be picking up refurbished DDR5 for pennies from the decommissioned data centres.

  • source
  • parent