567
[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone. (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

you mean.. sidewalks? because those are very clearly sidewalks; as they are narrow, made of concrete, and there's absolutely no sign that bikes are allowed or were considered in the design.

I mean just look at the crossings, those are explicitly pedestrian crossings lol.

😳 1
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Not at all, pedestrians roadways.

    We bicyclist cannot accept less, I live where yes, sidewalks are rare & available in more quality in the nearest cities, but they are minimum & not wide enough. We must demand better.

    Our (I assume) country is more wealthy, than Scandinavian countries, yet they have better separation & whole roadways converted for non-motorized cyclist & can be used to get to more place, where I live such roadway is 15-miles away, with traffic from my home it takes 45-Mins. to get to it & it only goes along side US1 & connects to Metrorail’s first Southern Station & Metrobus station. I think letting other non-motorized ways for pedestrians to get around is okay.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent