you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'm worried that if buyers demand to practice in secret, it becomes practically impossible to regulate and for sex workers to implement proper occupational safety practices. For example, security guards to protect them from violent customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    That's a part of the problem... also this 'protective' approach labels prostiutes per se as victims and denys them autonomy.

    Here are two intersting reads about 'the nordic model' :

    https://www.academia.edu/50493737/The_Nordic_Model_in_Europe_Prostitution_Trafficking_and_Neo_Abolitionism

    https://scholar.google.de/scholar?as_ylo=2025&q=nordic+model+of+prostitution&hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5#d=gs_qabs&t=1770060948847&u=%23p%3Db8BF5LYTIuwJ

    Over all it seems like 'the nordic model' doesn't make prostiution disappear but reduces its general visibility... rather to the worse for men and women working (or being forced to worked) in this profession.

    Imho: This was forceable... declaring things illegal doesn't make them disappear, being it postitution (for which the efffort was made many times in history) or e.g. alcohol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    In France, it's a bit more complicated.

    According to the law anything implying money with a sex worker can be considered as pimping (which is obviously a criminal offense). You have a friend who is sex worker and they buy you a drink ? You're a pimp. You're a sex worker and you want to rent a flat? That's gonna be hard, because your landlord could be considered as a pimp.

    Even banks refuse to open accounts to sex workers. A french porn actress (Khalamite) is an activist on the subject and made a YT video about that a few time ago.

  • source
  • parent