Chinese propaganda is rampant on the fediverse. We need to discuss ways to combat this. One group- memes or something is wholly controlled by Chinese state actors. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 9 months ago (20 children)

The difference is that I don't get banned/censored on western instances for criticizing Trump or US military interventions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (15 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (14 children)

    Well sure you can criticize Trump there. But try criticizing the CCCP, China, or Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Insistent propaganda talking points and trolling are tolerated if they are from the Russian or China/CCP perspective. Honestly that's about all there is on their news or politics discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (10 children)

    You can criticize them as long as you aren't doing so from a liberal, anti-communist perspective. The genuine flaws of existing socialism are better analyzed by those that actually study socialism and socialist countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Ive been banned for criticzing the PRC explictly from a socialist perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (8 children)

    You were temp-banned, for dogmatically repeating debunked claims pushed by liberals, in the face of evidence to the contrary. You appear to be free to comment there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Didnt know it was temp. Thank you

    One was more despite the evidence of clear worker rights violations that was argued was fine because the state is "the workers". The second I got called to provide evidence (which sure no probs there) but then silenced lmao. Super frustrating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

    What you called "clear worker rights violations," was just the fact that unions are required to be a part of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, and aren't allowed to be independent from that federation. This isn't a violation of worker rights, though, as the only purpose rogue unions would serve is undermining the socialist system, and would be vulnerable to foreign backing (such as from the US Empire).

    The socialist state is already run by the working classes, I recommend Roland Boer's Socialism in Power: On the Theory and History of Socialist Governance to get a better idea of how and why socialist countries hold the structures they do. Roland Boer also has a good book called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A Guide for Foreigners, which is more specifically about the PRC and goes beyond the structures of governance to the more broad system of socialism in China.

    Regarding your participation in MeanwhileOnGrad, you should know that EmoPunker cut off the final replies, where they called defenders of Pol Pot "genuine socialists." These are the kinds of posts on that comm, they selectively remove context that makes themselves look worse, deliberately misframe reasonable comments, and the comm itself is run by a zionist. This kind of anti-communist bar is a gathering spot for genuine fascists, but it seems you're fine with participating there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'm curious if you have any good video essays, I really enjoy learning while doing things, which is much more difficult with reading, though I have started Socialism With Chinese Characteristics and it is interesting!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Not nearly as in-depth due to time limits (and mostly focused on the Xi Jinping era) but Red Pen's A Summary of Xi Jinping's Governance of China can be a good primer! There's also This is how China's economic model works: Explaining Socialism with Chinese Characteristics by Geopolitical Economy Report.

    Really, in order to understand the PRC, you at least need to understand Mao, the Gang of Four, Deng Xiaoping, and Xi Jinping. There were other leaders, but these have perhaps had the largest impact on the PRC of today. Xi Jinping Thought upholds Mao Zedong Thought and Deng Xiaoping Theory, while believing the Gang of Four to have been left-deviationists and the Cultural Revolution to have contained more excess than was worth.

    Also, the Prolewiki page for Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A Guide for Foreigners is pretty poorly formatted, and extremely lengthy, so I recommend either going to the anna's archive link and downloading the source directly, or reading these:

    1. Qiao Collective's Introductory Socialism with Chinese Characteristics Study Guide

    2. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics ProleWiki page

    3. Socialist Market Economy ProleWiki Page

    4. People's Republic of China ProleWiki Page

    5. My "Read Theory, Darn It!" Introductory Marxist-Leninist Reading Guide

    6. Has China Turned to Capitalism? Reflections on the Transition from Capitalism to Socialism by Domenico Losurdo

    7. China Has Billionaires by Roderic Day

    8. The Long Game and its Contradictions

    9. Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin

    10. Super-Imperialism: The Origins and Fundamentals of U.S. World Dominance by Michael Hudson

    11. Marxism is a Science by Deng Xiaoping

    12. Regarding the Construction of Socialism With Chinese Characteristics by Xi Jinping

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Fair point those workers trying to organize against unfair labor practices would undermine the state. The state was surely handling super well already actually. /s

    Thank you for the reads though i will check those out even if we disagree on this so fat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Rogue unions aren't simply "workers trying to organize against unfair labor practices," though, which is my point. There are already unions, and the state already punishes bad actors. There's extremely minimal grassroots opposition to the socialist system in China, so recognizing this context is important.

    And no problem, let me know if you have any questions!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    You don't get banned on hex, grad, or ml for it either, either. People should really check the mod logs a few times daily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Okay.. From the last couple days.

    Removed Comment He's also either blackmailed or employed by china (multiple visits including his honeymoon, where he spent the night not with his wife but in the room with a number of school kids that he also brought with him... On his honeymoon) by NihilsineNefas @slrpnk.net reason: Misinformation

    mod Removed Comment There are lots of countries, including all the western countries where fewer people answered affirmatively to that question, where people are far more free to express their opinions than in China, though. The most obvious reason being that the majority of the world's countries do not have a Great Firewall. This is what shows that there is a bias in the Chinese answers -- or possibly a bias the other way in the western ones, but either way it means the results are not meaningfully comparable. edit: > What's happening is that working class speech is relatively free, while capitalist and corporate speech is not. That's why the vast majority say they have freedom of speech, while we know the state censors private, capitalist speech. "I don't want to work the 996 work week" is the epitome of working class speech, whereas supporting it is corporate speech. China chose to censor it. by turdas @suppo.fi reason: misinformation

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Time mod Action

    mod Banned realitista @lemm.ee from the community Technology reason: Rule 1 expires: 7 months ago

    mod Removed Comment More like someone who lives in a country that survived communism and the oppression that it brings and who would never go back. Why don't you guys move to China or North Korea (or inexplicably Russia which you also brigade for). Try living in the utopias you brigade for? by realitista @lemm.ee reason: Rule 1

    mod Removed Comment You should pop on over to North Korea and tell us how great it is there. by realitista @lemm.ee reason: Rule 1

    mod Removed Comment .ml is leaking again. by realitista @lemm.ee reason: Rule 2

    mod Removed Post Trump wants green card applicants legally in US to hand over social media profiles reason: Duplicate

    mod Locked Post Trump wants green card applicants legally in US to hand over social media profiles

    mod Removed Post Elon Musk is named after a character in a book written by a Nazi, Werner Von Braun reason: Video link

    mod Locked Post Elon Musk is named after a character in a book written by a Nazi, Werner Von Braun

    mod Removed Post Donald Trump said on Thursday the survival of Ukraine is important to the United States, a shift in tone days before the House votes on a $61 billion aid package for Ukraine reason: Twitter links not allowed, articles only.

    mod Removed Comment That's a false equivalence. Every country is imperialist if you go back far enough. My concern is about today's political and security situation, not that of 200+ years ago. by realitista @lemm.ee reason: Rule 1

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)