678
I love it (programming.dev)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 51 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Nope, can't find this ancient version of libc!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 47 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    You can still compile it against the modern version.

    And if it's static linked it will either run or you can ask Linus to murder someone for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    I was trying to compile the first version of SuperTuxKart just for fun, how naive I were... Nowadays it's like translating ancient runes and good luck finding those ancient libraries

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    If I may, is there a way to quickly and easily have a disposable/revertible environment for building? For Fedora specifically. It's annoying to install a whole suite of packages because I need them just this once and then either manually delete the ones I didn't manually install before and actually need or just live with a whole bunch of devel packages that'll never be used again

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It's funny because that's true that an old Linux binary is likely to have issues under Linux, but an similarly old Windows application might work better under Wine on Linux than modern Windows.

    libc is actually relatively less likely, glibc is awfully conservative about changes, but there are a maze of likely service and library dependencies that were abandoned or didn't regard backwards compatibility with the same importance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent