you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Them saying that they are a private institution and make their own rules isn’t quite saying what Trump and co told you it meant.

It was the easiest legal argument to make.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

    A private organization until it is time for federal funding.

    Fuck off, pathetic defender of oligarchy.

    Edit: If the corruption of the DNC was purely an invention of Trump, DWS wouldn't have lost her position and DB wouldn't have lost her job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Private organizations can get federal funding too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Love how you ignored the explicit mentions of proven cheating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You call it cheating because Trump and co told you it was.

    The WikiLeaks documents didn't prove anything Bernie himself realized he lost on Jun 24th and stepped down to endorse Clinton.

    Why do you want to keep rehashing right wing propaganda about a 10 year old primary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Wikileaks absolutely proved Donna Brazile funneled debate questions to Clinton.

    Trump didn't tell me anything, in that I understand how DKIM works. Evidently you don't, so you want to try and pretend that the emails were faked or modified. That's not how encryption works, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment