140
Wayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance] (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 9 months ago (10 children)

I get very good fps in every game I play on my 2080ti that's very much not new. I've had to download a fix for one game I have, and Sony doesn't allow multiplayer in Ghost of Tsushima, but every other game literally loads and runs better than they ever have. 100fps+ in most games, and maybe less than 60 in the most intense. Arch + kde + Wayland is easily the best computing experience I've ever had.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    I didn't say Wayland had bad performance, if you read I said that x11 has better performance. For Wayland being new and more modern it should not underperform and dude just fucking look benchmarks online, you have internet.

    Here this one is for free, how you candy read. https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/wayland-vs-x11-performance-amd-graphics.html

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I've had no performance degredation moving to Wayland after the aformentioned update. I read what you said. I've noticed no difference in performance, and anyone that's fretting about 120 fps vs 110 fps is just splitting hairs for the sake of be being pedantic. I concede that there are some features that don't exist that don't apply to me and the vast majority of users, but for most of us, Wayland is just as good if not better in some common aspects.

    No need to be hostile my dude. Chill.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Na I'll always be hostile it's more fun, I would less hostile if people stop the with telling what works for them, like I'm going to fucking get the same setup as dem. You do understand that there's more angles than one, and not stopping and thinking yourself about the issue at hand and making weird assumptions without looking up anything, is kinda annoying after a while.

    Because that is how most people are on Lemmy, it's so hard to just have a discussion because you always have some people make counterpoints that fucking suck ass, and not based in anyone else's reality but their own.

    If I wouldn't be hostile I would just stop writing, and it's not like I'm angry, it's just sounds funnier.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    If your only two options are hostile or silent, let's go with silent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •