I do think it's fine, though I do want to point out the word "cyclist" does carry some "weight" to it especially in North America.

For example a individual like Forester would disagree, this dudes "studies" are essentially what all North American city planners follow regrettably. Link to a summary of this topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPduRHBhHI

Its also why its so hard to explain why dedicated separate bike infrastructure is so important. Most city planners for some reason forget that children and older individuals cycle.