Objection comments on A tweet about the 2024 election.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Are you fucking kidding me? That's literally the exact thing that you're saying.

Them: Here are Biden's stances, and I consider them inexcusable"

You: Actually, they are excusable because lists a bunch of stuff Trump did

If that's not what you're saying, then go ahead and explain how Biden's actions are excusable, why supporting him is defensible, without doing a whataboutism by bringing up Trump doing the same thing. As the other commenter requested.

I swear, whataboutism is just something y'all made up where the only rule is "I'm always right." What a load of bull.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

Whataboutism would be if I said "Biden's support for the Gaza genocide is acceptable because Trump rapes little girls". What I actually said was "Biden's warmongering is nowhere near as severe as Trump's warmongering".

And the difference matters, because the context was a tweet that says "If you vote for Biden, you will be at war, so you should vote for Trump".

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago

Whataboutism would be if I said “Biden’s support for the Gaza genocide is acceptable because Trump rapes little girls”. What I actually said was “Biden’s warmongering is nowhere near as severe as Trump’s warmongering”.

That's complete bullshit. There's no requirement that you change the topic of the thing in question, that's 100% arbitrary.

If someone criticized China for saber-rattling with Taiwan, and in response I brought up that the US had not only saber-rattled but actually conducted full scale invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan, would that be a whataboutism? Because I would certainly expect to see people lob the accusation at me.

because the context was a tweet that says “If you vote for Biden, you will be at war, so you should vote for Trump”.

The context is a comment thread where someone said that the first parts of the tweet were correct, but not the line endorsing Trump. You're being very dishonest by ignoring that. If you want to make a comment about the tweet in full, then make a top-level comment.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent