you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

I think that has mostly been debunked. Even the hunter gatherers were much more gathering than hunting, in the big picture. And fishing is probably more relevant than meat (if we're making that distinction). And later it was really agriculture that made our species what it is and it's very much the grains (and rice) that made the big difference.

Not a vegan btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think you are giving a very eurocentric description of early humanity

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I agree. Still, the distinction is a very cultural one. So many cultures, even civilisations can trace their beginning back to a coastline or river. Hunting things like mammoths was actually quite rare, but it makes for better stories. Taxonomically there isn't even such a thing as a "fish".

  • source
  • parent