191
Steam updates AI disclosure form to specify that it's focused on AI-generated content that is 'consumed by players,' not efficiency tools used behind the scenes (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I literally just gave you all sorts of examples of how or where.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    You literally gave me nothing but speculation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Hence the you're just delusional because you really don't understand what's going on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    You're the delusional one if you think everyone and everything was coded with AI. That's just incredibly ignorant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not saying it was entirely coded with AI, but AI has had some involvement.

    You clearly stated you think any use should be disclosed, as per the old steam policy, and that you wouldn't use anything if it was disclosed as used.

    In some shape or form, it has been involved with PieFed, and it would require a disclosure if they were being honest about it.

    There are over 40 contributors on codeberg repository. That's 40 people that you have to belive have never asked ChatGPT a question about the work they were doing on it, that didn't base a descision off the Google search result AI response at the top, that didn't use any of the IDE code completion tools built right into the software they use to write the software.

    It's just not happening.

    If you think you can use software like this that isn't tainted by it, you're just flat out wrong at this point and moving forward in the world.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    AI has had some involvement

    it has been involved with PieFed

    You keep suggesting this but you can't provide any evidence whatsoever. And until you do I'll continue to reject your nonsense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Here there's talk on their repository about using an AI detection service (which is AI) to try and flag AI.

    https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/issues/605

    I tried a 3B version of the same model and it couldn't detect that the sample text that came with the repo was AI. So we'd need a GPU capable of loading an 7B model which means at least 8 GB of RAM. afaik the demo script does two detections as examples of what's possible but either one will do the job.

    They were talking about a service they thought maybe they could even have run on your machine.

    Doesn't matter if they used it or not in the end, AI was used in the development process.

    Tell yourself whatever you need to so you can sleep at night, but of the 40+ people contributing to the project and they're openly talking about AI on their repository, well I can't help you...

    I'm expecting no reply to this message as it would constitute you using a service that involved AI.

    Edit: and pay attention to the names in that thread and who owns the repository.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Doesn't matter if they used it or not in the end

    Uh...that's the only thing that matters.

    AI was used in the development process.

    No it wasn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •