you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 9 months ago*

I think the issue here is you are reading

Looks like it's a YouGov survey, and the article cites a second YouGov survey as corroboration, so I'm not sure how scientifically rigorous this is.

As

Looks like it's a survey, and the article cites a second survey as corroboration, so I'm not sure how scientifically rigorous this is.

My issue is with it being YouGov specifically, not that both were from the same source. Then I looked at the PDFs themselves to confirm they were opt-in web surveys before adding my edit.

Personally I do think he's guilty and would love it if 71% think he was at least complicit.

Not really interested in taking this further though. Enjoy your day.

  • source
  • parent