you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Way to talk down and be a dickhead without answering the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (11 children)

    I said this was generated. You decided to take it personally. I didnt say you knew, or you had bad intentions. I said it was ironic the post appeared to be generated. That is all. If you want to get all up and arms about it, claim you made the comic, but I cant find the artist anywhere, and then you want to be snarky, thats on you. Its not my fault.you post as cm002, show up as RalphNader, and post 400 articles a day. Maybe if you find accusations of AI to be annoying you should ask why it is people are thinking that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago* (6 children)
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    The account you're arguing with runs a disinfo community where he posts fake articles with no disclaimers, and then engages seriously in the comments with the people he dupes as if the articles were real, and never mentions that they are indeed fake.

    Until someone calls him out on it, and then he gets all self-righteous and compares himself to the onion, and acts like the people calling out his bullshit are defending the people and organisations he's spreading disinfo about.

    Like, someone can hate walmart and still be against disinfo. There's plenty of legitimate criticisms to make; making up bullshit and spreading disinfo is not the way.

    I wouldn't take him seriously. I'd even say he likely doesn't have any affiliation with Ralph Nader. Maybe he's secretly trying to make Ralph Nader look bad by being a dick on the internet in his name...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)