as they invented euphemisms like ‘hallucinations’

Seems like a pretty accurate word to use, no? Could also use fabrication, concoction, phantom, or something else? I think "lie" and its synonyms are not accurate, since that requires intent. Since the LLM does not have intent, it cannot "lie".

I said, in other words, that it doesn't matter what they do until this problem is solved. So if this is described as some sort of rebellion against AI (or "AI"), then no. At the point where it becomes dangerous technology in itself and not just for economy, it won't be.

I'm not talking about LLMs. I'm talking about future developments learning on LLMs, eventually there will be some resolutions of conflicting knowledge and logical connections, otherwise they won't become remotely as useful as advertised.

Not really, more like "if I can find a key to the door, I can open it, so engraving a fixed combination for the door lock on the same key doesn't change much".

Poisoned data is fundamentally valid data. Concepts of logical connectivity and statements being true or false are something needed to use it.