you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 10 months ago (12 children)

I guess there was one? Why would it be like this otherwise

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Maybe a long time ago, I've lived here 15 years and there's not been one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Other than the ADA compliance mentioned, there's also weird property ownership and utility access things that can come up.
    The laws that give them the ability to put sidewalks on your property usually phrase a limit on where they can put it. They can't just cut a 45° corner off your lawn because it's easier. If the property that owns that wall technically exists in a funny shape their sketches of the plan could have happily breezed along making a weird gap.
    There could also be a utility junction under that area that they didn't want to cover.

    I don't think there was a tree because you don't see the mound or divot that you usually see if there was a tree somewhere, at least one big enough to warrant that much of a sidewalk swerve.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Because some designer said so. Doesn’t have to be a reason other than “I think we’ll bend this here towards the crosswalk.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago*

    They typically don’t waste concrete unless spec’d or otherwise needed. Doing a T would be cheaper, but would leave the leg down to the intersection too steep for a wheelchair.

    This is a common sidewalk method.

  • source
  • parent