▲ 219 ▼ Main path 5 minutes from the city CBD (aussie.zone) submitted 10 months ago by Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone to c/desire_paths@sh.itjust.works 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (12 children) I guess there was one? Why would it be like this otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone [S] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children) Maybe a long time ago, I've lived here 15 years and there's not been one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (1 child) Plant one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago Given the desire path, it probably wouldn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago long time ago in a galaxy far away permalink fedilink source parent [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago Other than the ADA compliance mentioned, there's also weird property ownership and utility access things that can come up. The laws that give them the ability to put sidewalks on your property usually phrase a limit on where they can put it. They can't just cut a 45° corner off your lawn because it's easier. If the property that owns that wall technically exists in a funny shape their sketches of the plan could have happily breezed along making a weird gap. There could also be a utility junction under that area that they didn't want to cover. I don't think there was a tree because you don't see the mound or divot that you usually see if there was a tree somewhere, at least one big enough to warrant that much of a sidewalk swerve. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Anything weird like this is usually to meet ADA requirements for wheelchairs. Can only have so much slope each way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone [S] 3 points 10 months ago That makes sense, you cross the road here and there's one of the major bus stops on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 child) Because some designer said so. Doesn’t have to be a reason other than “I think we’ll bend this here towards the crosswalk.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* They typically don’t waste concrete unless spec’d or otherwise needed. Doing a T would be cheaper, but would leave the leg down to the intersection too steep for a wheelchair. This is a common sidewalk method. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 10 months ago There were concepts of a plan to plant one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Because there’s a ramp on the left side of the image that leads somewhere, like a crosswalk! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago straight line plus a T section? It's just weird like this. Well, whatever permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone [S] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children) Maybe a long time ago, I've lived here 15 years and there's not been one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (1 child) Plant one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago Given the desire path, it probably wouldn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago long time ago in a galaxy far away permalink fedilink source parent
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (1 child) Plant one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago Given the desire path, it probably wouldn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago Given the desire path, it probably wouldn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago long time ago in a galaxy far away permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago Other than the ADA compliance mentioned, there's also weird property ownership and utility access things that can come up. The laws that give them the ability to put sidewalks on your property usually phrase a limit on where they can put it. They can't just cut a 45° corner off your lawn because it's easier. If the property that owns that wall technically exists in a funny shape their sketches of the plan could have happily breezed along making a weird gap. There could also be a utility junction under that area that they didn't want to cover. I don't think there was a tree because you don't see the mound or divot that you usually see if there was a tree somewhere, at least one big enough to warrant that much of a sidewalk swerve. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Anything weird like this is usually to meet ADA requirements for wheelchairs. Can only have so much slope each way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone [S] 3 points 10 months ago That makes sense, you cross the road here and there's one of the major bus stops on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone [S] 3 points 10 months ago That makes sense, you cross the road here and there's one of the major bus stops on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 child) Because some designer said so. Doesn’t have to be a reason other than “I think we’ll bend this here towards the crosswalk.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* They typically don’t waste concrete unless spec’d or otherwise needed. Doing a T would be cheaper, but would leave the leg down to the intersection too steep for a wheelchair. This is a common sidewalk method. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* They typically don’t waste concrete unless spec’d or otherwise needed. Doing a T would be cheaper, but would leave the leg down to the intersection too steep for a wheelchair. This is a common sidewalk method. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 10 months ago There were concepts of a plan to plant one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Because there’s a ramp on the left side of the image that leads somewhere, like a crosswalk! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago straight line plus a T section? It's just weird like this. Well, whatever permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago straight line plus a T section? It's just weird like this. Well, whatever permalink fedilink source parent