you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 10 months ago (3 children)

While this is ostensibly a sorely needed change, I’m also certain he’ll find a way to do it in a way that hurts people, doesn’t actually solve the problem or do what he’s saying it will do, and also makes himself a shitload of money.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Simple: They'll reclassify as to what counts as a single family home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Clearly, one family won't be able to fit in a 1-bed, 1-bath shack. With 3 kids, they'll need at least 4 bedrooms and 2 baths. Include the grandparents on both sides, and that's 6 bedrooms, 4 baths. And for good measure, add a guest room with its own bathroom.

    It makes perfect sense to reclassify a "single family home" as a 7-bed, 5-bath McMansion. Anything less is just a rental suite, obviously /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    It makes perfect sense to reclassify a "single family home" as a 7-bed, 5-bath McMansion. Anything less is just a rental suite, obviously /s

    You could fit an extra couple in there though if needed, so that's not a single family home either.

    Might be 0 SFH in the USA

  • source
  • parent