you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 10 months ago

Granting legislative powers to the executive is not a check or balance, it disrupts the separation of powers.

It is not a legislative power though. A veto is not the executive writing a law. A veto is the executive saying "hey Senate, this bill sucks and I don't want to implement it. Go back to the drawing board and either make something I like, or make something that all of you like more than 2/3." Its a forced reconsideration that can avoid hastily written laws passed on a 50+1 and create laws that are more broadly palatable to the country as a whole.

Again, it makes sense in a rational system, with rational people- something we haven't had since before Reagan.

  • source
  • parent