you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (17 children)

Looking for a better calendar without arbitrary new year 🤣

https://sac13.net/

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Good start. Now you need a better leap year rule to reduce the calendar drift. Make sure September, October, November, December are now months 7, 8, 9, 10 (because that's what there names imply) but don't just rename them or they won't fit the time of year people expect them to be, then make all months equal and we are almost there 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You don't need to adjust for calendar drift if you start the year on a soltice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    True, but that would lead to the same mess the Iranian calendar has, that you can't calculate which year will be a leap year. This leads to fragmentation, lot of custom implementations of algorithms that are more or less accurate for the next hundred years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I prefer the opposite: The 'Pataphysical calendar

    • every day has a name, as well as a number
    • the last day of the month exists on the calendar but doesn't happen in reality (with some exceptions)
    • every month has a Friday 13th
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Never heard of that one before. What's the point of having an imaginary 29th?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (3 children)

    it emerged out of the surrealist movement via Alfred Jarry.

    For reference his play "Ubu Roi" (Ubu the King) starts with the word "merdre" (often translated at "pshit" or "shitski") - which after it was uttered in the first performance, caused a 15 minute riot in the theatre.

    The purpose, such as it is, is that you can make it "unimaginary" for a leap year etc, or if you need an extra day in a month for whatever reason - and it doesn't alter the rest of the year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I still don't see the benefits. It's a bit like saying that every Februar (in the Gregorian calendar) had 29 days but sometimes it's imaginary and sometimes it's not.

    Would you phone calendar show "imaginary days"? Could you schedule meetings on imaginary days? If yes - that would probably be a complete mess, and if not - why even call it "imaginary day" if it's not a day at all.

    Seems a bit like a bandaid that tries to make it more symmetric/pretty. We could expand all months to 32 days in the Gregorian calender and just call some of the days imaginary. That way all months would be the exact same length 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I'm not a fan of base 10. I'm really like the consistency of the metric system but base 10 is/was a mistake and base 6 or 12 would have been way better for everyday use (including clocks) because of the number of prime factors. 6 and 12 are what's called superior highly composite numbers (SHCN) which make them great choices for bases in a number system because it simplifies a lot of manual everyday calculations, especially divisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And fix the prefixes Sept, Oct., and Dec to align with the months while you're at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments