you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Makes sense, I've never been to Asia and I was only in Europe for a couple weeks, so the only European airport I saw was Heathrow, where I took the metro.

I'm not disagreeing that it's safer to have a barrier, or saying that barriers aren't a thing, just that it's common enough not to have them to be used to it. I don't think about that danger. I haven't seen a space like that before, no.

I lived in Vancouver for almost a decade, where the trains are driverless and there aren't walls or barriers, even at the airport.

But I did just learn what an automated people mover is, and some of them are adorable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    just that it's common enough not to have them to be used to it

    It's the difference between public transit as a public service vs. public transit as a profit-making venture (in some places) or at least as public service being "run like a business" (more common in the west).

    As soon as "business" is uttered in the management of something, you get to cost minimization and life-saving measures tend to cost money. They're thus the first things cut unless forced otherwise by regulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment