People Twitter

whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

10,574 readers

4,751 active

606 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician

https://www.sotwe.com/
https://twitterviewer.net/Note: Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

This seems specifically designed to break mail-in voting (USPS postmark rule change) (lemmy.zip)

submitted 10 months ago by BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive links: https://web.archive.org/web/20251229233408/https://bsky.app/profile/goldengateblond.bsky.social/post/3mb5t23bf3k23 or https://archive.is/uvuWB

If you want to vote by mail please do so as soon as you can and consider dropping it off at the counter where they will postmark it right away.

Also if you live in a state where you're allowed to photograph your ballot consider doing so to have proof you voted a certain way.

Note that as a counterpoint the federal register website claims they are just clarifying language to improve public understanding: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/12/2025-15266/postmarks-and-postal-possession

I didn't check that document very closely yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

again, youre just talking about something entirely different. you said you dont see how a certain system was subject to abuse and i made up a possible way. all this talk about some system being more or less subject to abuse than another has nothing to do with the fact you said you couldnt see how a certain system was subject to abuse. i am not making a claim about any system being better than another so i have no idea why youre bringing that up

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 10 months ago

Fair enough, looks like we communicated past each other to some extent. I took your first comment as arguing this system was more subject to abuse.