I use it because it has a built in adblocker, and well it just works.

There is some crypto bullfuck and AI shit you can easily opt out off, and some talk about some CEO making homophobic comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

You know what's better than that?

The browser world that's not a chrome fork, and not full of crypto and AI SHIT, and without a bigoted CEO

Waterfox, Librewolf, Ironfox, Fennec, Ladybird, etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Is ladybird even out? I saw something about it but I thought looking it up got me to something about it being set for some release this next year?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Suggesting "very early alpha" software as a viable alternative is part of the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    The point is, that's a preference, not an innate 'better,' I generally use librewolf myself, but when the list of 'problems' with the browser is a set of optional things that you specifically have to turn on to experience, it's kind of like saying pizza is bad because you don't like pineapple, banana peppers, black olives, and chile flakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's more akin to saying Hitler Pizza is bad because it was baked by Hitler, tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That's not how pizza quality works. You wouldn't eat a pizza with literal shit all over it and call it good because it was made by a saint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments