Economic concerns and growing disenchantment with both parties is draining support for Trump among Gen Z young men, a key bloc of support during the 2024 election

Male Gen Z voters are breaking with Donald Trump and the Republican party at large, recent polls show, less than a year after this same cohort defied convention and made a surprise shift right, helping Trump win the 2024 election.

Taken with wider polling suggesting Democrats will lead in the midterms, the findings on young men spell serious trouble for the Republican Party in 2026.

Younger Gen Z men, those born between 2002 and 2007, may be even more anti-Trump, according to October research from YouGov and the Young Men’s Research Project, a potential sign that their time living through the social upheavals of the Covid pandemic and not being political aware during the first Trump administration may be shaping their experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 10 months ago (7 children)

have the AI cite it sources for the claims it makes, and read through those sources. ask the AI what information it used in the source to come up with its statement.

using chatGPT in this way is like how I used Wikipedia growing up: just pull up an article on something, check out what citations an article had, and walk it backwards from there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    When searching something online, I already many times came across AI written articles being quite high. So now it's possible LLM will just cite another LLM which got its content from an LLM written response on Reddit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    These ChatGPT articles are ruining the internet, it's almost all I can find now when searching for information.

    I ask a question in google and then get sent to a website which has a novel about why my question is a good question and then gives the simplest 5 outcomes/solutions (i.e. did you turn it off and on again?) with zero photos or diagrams or anything and it's just a giant waste of my time.

    I only need to open a webpage for like 5 seconds before I know it is going to be worthless.

    Is there a way to blacklist a web domain from ever popping up in your Google search results again?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    Does the paid chat gpt actually cite?

    The free one (which most people are using), when asked how much an aircraft carrier costs just links to the main page of CNBC and the department of defense.

    I further prompted and it gave me 404s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    It does a mix of hallucination and self-correction once you tell it to search the web to actually find out current information. And even then, you don't have a good chance of having truly accurate information. It really does take work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    not sure if only the paid gpt actually cites, but anyone thats trying to show someone else how inefficient LLMs are with data should be able to come to the conclusion the output is untrustworthy if you're getting 404 errors after asking to cite, in my opinion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The problem is it "cites" things by inserting obscured hyperlinks that people see and never click but assume there is a "source"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment