you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 103 points 10 months ago (16 children)

Did this.... Actually happen?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

    Did this…. Actually happen?

    Yes, at 5:54 in "BREAKING NEWS: Trump Takes Phone Calls From Children Calling NORAD's Santa Claus Phone Line" - Forbes Breaking News (https://youtu.be/QRSrH3hfsos?t=354).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    The time jump skipped the fact that he was told she was 8 years old when passed the call!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Who else would call a santa hotline?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Yes, but the implication that he heard 8 years old + thought to still call her beautiful and cute. Not that he made a gaff and was then informed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -25 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Have you never heard an 8 year old child called 'cute' or 'beautiful' in a nonsexual way? I'm not saying that was Trump's intention or not, but given there's actual allegations of him raping a 13 year old, maybe we should focus on that rather than easily misinterpreted statements?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, in person from a family member. Not from a stranger hearing a voice of a child for the first time. This isn't a phone sex line and is NORAD's Santa line as stated.

    This event is building into the overall narrative of Trump. Yes, he probably did rape a 13 year old and my comments aren't taking away from that. This is a sign of this thought process. He hears a child, visualizes the child, and makes a creepy remark that he feels is ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Congratulations, you just defended a pedo without any good reason. You failed so completely at recognising context and objective facts that the only thing you managed to do is show everyone that you're either a pedo apologist, so fucking dumb you shouldn't be able to write or both of those things.

  • source
  • parent