you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Underemployment has always been an ignored statistic. The media and government report a single number as some sort of status of the economy, when it's so much more complex than one data point.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with you as well of the spirit of what the study in the article is trying to do, but I do object to the terminology they used, as it muddies the waters unnecessarily. A term like "underemployed" is much better than "functionally unemployed."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment