Of the total area that is used by humans (Agriculture, Urban and Built-up Land),

  • urban and built-up land is 1m km²,
  • agriculture is 48m km²,

so agriculture is 48 of 49 millions km² used, that's 98%. The remaining 2% are all streets and housing and other infrastructure together.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago (10 children)

It's like engaging with a bad-faith hydra - one of these is literally just a single word reply. If you can't even make your nonsense feasible to engage with why should I extend you the courtesy of treating you as anything other than the poor troll you're behaving like?

You've misunderstood my initial claims and/or the data, which are both abundantly clear - and on top of that you've spent this whole time acting like a jerk. I'm not going to reward this behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (9 children)

    this is just posturing and accusations. your evidence doesn't sufficiently support the claim you e made, and now you're making excuses not to present sufficient evidence. I strongly suspect you don't have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (8 children)

    Lmfao I already provided evidence that 1:1 matches exactly what I said (because I based my initial claims off it), quit yer bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)

    saying it doesn't make it true

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    It doesn't make it false, either. That's the nice thing about truth, it doesn't care what you think about it, it's just self-evident. Good grief you're really not very good at this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    anyone can read what you claimed, evaluate the supposed evidence you provided, and see it does not support your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Well no, they can read the evidence and then draw their own conclusions. I'm not so arrogant as to try and speak for them, a moral burden you appear delightfully unencumbered by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    anyone who believes what you've presented supports your claim does not understand the claim or the evidence or both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    So now you're not only trying to speak for them, you're implying they're stupid? Bold move there buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments